Fontip & The power of Shnick-Shnack
by Gil Rosen

Shnick-Shnack is not a word you’ll find in Webster or in Wikipedia but it should get there soon. In one of my recent trips to Europe, someone quoted a big shot CEO for one of the leading mobile operators as saying early in 2000 that “ringtones are shnick-shnacks” or in other words “irrelevant” OR “not significant” ….yada yada yada, 7 years later, they have generated a multi-billion dollar industry.
The context of the conversation was one of humbleness. One should not dismiss what seems like a shnick-shnack service at a wave of hand, with a dismissive ..“…this will never catch on…” attitude. Sometimes people want shnick-shnacks. Sometimes shnick-shnacks let you get personal, express yourself. Fontip is just that kind of thing.
Simply put, Fontip provides what’s called FMS or Font Messaging Service (yes…you ain’t a startup unless you invent a new abbreviation). Using Fontip’s mobile client every mobile user can send colorful text messages combined with jumpy icons and crazy slangons. Its kind of like
incredimail for SMS.
Is this shnick-shnack of what
Incredimail is another perfect example for a shnick-shnack service. Do you really need it?No. Does it solve any technological barrier? No. Is it innovative in a way that can’t be duplicated? No. Yet these are ‘VC type’ questions. People have psychological motivations and drives and look for services that answers such needs regardless of passing the ‘investment benchmark’ checklist.
If Fontip is first to serve the need to personalize sms’s and does it well, there is no reason why it can’t be a huge success. Making communications personal (and cool) has landed Incredimail with a huge install base with around 50 million client downloads!
Will Fontip follow suite? I’m no prophet but there is no reason why they shouldn’t. There is no reason why out of the billions of SMS users there will not be enough ‘personalization’ freaks that will go ahead and down load it.
Competition may come from the handset providers, with them creating built tools or similar services, but with such a wide audience there should be a room for them all.
Is this another 7 billion dollars shnick-shnack market, probably not, but the power of shnick-shnack has surprised before.
Gil Rosen
Track with:
Rock Bands and Start Ups Part II - The Battle
by Aner Ravon
My Buddy Danny Cohen read my Rock Band post and gave me a big compliment by battling back. In his post, Danny highlights an interesting similarity in the area of naming. On the other hand he dismisses the more fundamental point I was trying to make, saying that Rock bands don’t live in the world of “Barriers to Entry” or “Unfair advantage”, and most of them don’t “Fulfill a need”.
This is probably my own subjective point of view, but I argue that rock bands face these exact issues!
Let’s start with barriers to entry. I’ve heard more stories about the long, painful and ugly journeys of rock stars than I have of startupists. Artists, unlike high tech professionals, do not have a decent fallback. Many, Most(!) go through waiting tables and living in misery for long years before they get discovered. If they ever get discovered. After all, do we realize how difficult it is to make a national radio play list? MTV? Billboard Charts? The journey from a local basement in Cleveland to Madison Square Garden is definitely not shorter or easier than the one from seed investment to millions of daily page views.
Moving on to unfair advantage. If you’re a new-be singer with your own unique style, for example, Britney Spears, Byonce and Madonna can copy you in a split second and use their well oiled machine to produce and distribute. All it takes is a decision. As a matter of fact I would argue that Madonna made a career out of “scout and copy” techniques, but that would be a different discussion. When environments are so educated and so competitive, every trick is easily copied and the incumbents have a huge advantage. In that respect a Google / YouTube and Sequoia are not different than Guns n’ Roses and Geffen.
Finally, we get to fulfilling a need. I always considered this term to be slightly abused. Unfortunately it’s very hard to rationalize the exact solution to an exact need because needs have powerful intangible ingredients. Take a look at YouTube for example. What need does it answer exactly? Is it something rational, like free storage or free bandwidth? Or perhaps something much more emotional, such as discovery, creativity or personal recognition?
All these factors didn’t deter Gemini from investing in an interesting company like eSnips and for the right reason. I’m sure there are always rational reasons, but there is one force that is much stronger than everything - the need to regenerate. We love new rock bands and we love new start ups. VCs, like Record labels share a common target - finding the new stars and helping them materialize. That requires predictive judgment and gambling on the right, that’s right, superstars.
Aner Ravon
Track with: